This category brings together anonymised or hypothetical case discussions.
It is used to:
- explore how similar decision issues arise across different authorities
- compare how evidence, reasoning, and conditions are handled
- examine recurring features in refusals, approvals, and committee outcomes
Cases posted here are used for learning rather than advocacy. The emphasis is on understanding how decisions are constructed, what was relied upon at decision stage, and where reasoning or assessment commonly becomes unclear.
Over time, this category helps turn individual scenarios into broader insight.